MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Lateral and air-water inorganic carbon and methane fluxes in a small Arctic river: Seasonal variations and the connections with local hydrology

2025· article· en· W4414463951 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Samantha F. Jones, Patrick J. Duke, Cara C. Manning, Stephen F. Gonski, Brent Else

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Science of The Total Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Northern British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaArcticNetArctic Institute of North AmericaPolar Knowledge CanadaKillam TrustsUniversity of CalgaryMarine Environmental Observation Prediction and Response Network
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Carbon cycleArcticHydrology (agriculture)SeasonalityDissolved organic carbonWater cycleTotal inorganic carbonSpring (device)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The importance of rivers to the global carbon cycle is well recognized, and the need for more measurements from historically understudied systems including Arctic rivers is essential in reducing bias. The proximity of Freshwater Creek to the community of Iqaluktuuttiaq (Cambridge Bay), Nunavut, Canada, makes it an excellent site for time-series study that appreciates pronounced seasonality. This detailed investigation acquired data representative of the river's annual cycle, including the dynamic spring melt season. Freshwater Creek exported 3.12 Gg C y −1 as DIC and 848 kg C y −1 as dissolved CH 4 to the downstream coastal ocean. The river was a net emitter of CO 2 that released (net) 22.0 Mg C y −1 to the atmosphere, but also experienced periods of CO 2 uptake. CH 4 emissions were 450 kg C yr −1 , and all fluxes exhibited strong seasonality with maximum concentrations and fluxes during breakup. The significance of breakup was evident; half of the annual DIC and CH 4 exported to the ocean occurred within 21–31 and 8–13 days of the onset on breakup respectively. DIC/CO 2 and CH 4 fluxes in Freshwater Creek are connected to local hydrology, thus changes to the water cycle with climate change will influence the timing and magnitude of carbon fluxes in this system. Our detailed account of seasonal variability will be a useful framework for similar systems that cannot be monitored all year, will provide context for the interpretation of existing data, and will aid in developing sampling plans with intention to observe a river's full range of conditions. • DIC, CO 2 , and CH 4 fluxes have strong seasonality connected to local hydrology. • Peak DIC, CO 2 , and CH 4 concentrations and fluxes occur during spring breakup. • Half of the annual DIC and CH 4 export to ocean occurs within several weeks. • Annual DIC export to ocean is two orders of magnitude larger than net CO 2 emissions. • Annual CH 4 emissions are almost double the annual CH 4 export to the ocean.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Science of The Total Environment→Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→