MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414465395 · doi:10.7759/cureus.93126

Examining the Representation of South Asian Populations in Substance Addiction Research: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2014 to 2024

2025· review· en· W4414465395 on OpenAlexaff
Khushi Singh, Teresa Fong, Asmaa Basonbul

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSouth asiaAddictionCitationSubstance useBibliometricsPopulationLimitingInclusion (mineral)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Substance addiction is a major global health concern, yet South Asian populations remain underrepresented in research, limiting understanding of how addiction affects these communities. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate substance addiction research productivity in South Asian populations through a 10-year bibliometric analysis (2014-2024). A systematic PubMed search identified 1,320 research publications that met the inclusion criteria. Extracted data included annual publication counts, article type, five-year journal impact factor (JIF), citation counts, and country of publication. South Asian populations were examined both as a whole and as specific subgroups from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, the Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. Annual publications showed a significant upward trend (slope=3.73 studies/year, p=0.016), increasing from 124 in 2014 to 164 in 2024. The highest number of studies was conducted on the Indian population (n=873; 66.1%), which was also the only group to show a significant growth trend (slope=3.13 studies/year, p=0.03). Additionally, most publications were original research articles (58.9%), with a mean five-year JIF of 4.87 and an average of 30.5 citations per article. Populations from Afghanistan and India had the highest values for these metrics, while the rest remained underrepresented. Furthermore, India (n=494) and the United States (n=332) were the top countries of publication, together producing 63% of all research. Notably, six of the top 10 publishing countries were outside South Asia. In conclusion, research on substance addiction in South Asian populations has grown significantly over the past decade but remains heavily skewed toward India, with other groups underrepresented in both research quantity and quality. Through identifying these trends, this study highlights critical gaps and priorities for more equitable research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.061
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.061
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0930.126
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.451
GPT teacher head0.518
Teacher spread0.067 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureus→Same topicHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk→French-language works237,207→