Abstract PR-14: Unraveling the sexually dimorphic immune microenvironment in gastric cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Gastric cancer is a sexually dimorphic disease. Male patients have twice the incidence, are diagnosed at a younger age, and have worse survival outcomes than females. Whether there are molecular mechanisms that underlie these sex-based differences is unclear. We generated genetically engineered mice on C57BL/6 backgrounds with parietal cell-specific conditional deletions of Trp53 and Cdh1, two tumor suppressors commonly lost in gastric cancer (Atp4b-Cre; Trp53 flox/flox ; Cdh1 flox/flox , “APC” mice). APC mice developed gastric cancer with 100% penetrance and median overall survival was significantly longer in females (50.6 weeks, N = 20) than males (41.7 weeks, N = 23; p < 0.001). At the time of death, serum were collected and circulating cytokines were quantified using multiplex ELISA. Females had significantly higher levels of circulating IFN-γ (60.8 pg/mL vs. 10.9 pg/mL; p = 0.02) and CCL4 (257 pg/mL vs. 118.3 pg/mL; p = 0.001), suggesting enhanced cytotoxic lymphocyte and macrophage activity. Bulk RNA sequencing of tumors revealed significant enrichment of Hallmark Gene Sets associated with type I and II interferon responses and antigen presentation pathways in females. These findings suggested an immune-mediated basis for the survival difference seen between male and female APC mice. To further explore the immune microenvironment, we derived cell lines from APC tumors and performed flank injections into C57BL/6 mice. Tumor volumes at 6 weeks were not significantly different between sexes (645 mm2 in females vs. 951 mm2 in males; p = 0.35). However, flow cytometry revealed marked immune differences in total CD8+ T cells (2.4% in females vs. 0.63% in males vs.; p = 0.05), activated CD8+ T cells (23.0% vs. 9.2%; p < 0.001), dendritic cells (2.6% vs. 1.3% of myeloid cells; p = 0.05), and a trend toward increased M1 macrophages in females (1.6% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.06). We next evaluated the role of sex hormones in mediating sex-associated differences in gastric cancer. Females underwent oophorectomies (F-O) or sham operations (F-S), while males underwent orchiectomies (M-O) or sham operations (M-S). Median overall survival was significantly longer in F-S mice (47.1 weeks, N = 7) compared to F-O mice (44.1 weeks, N = 6; p=0.003). In contrast, median overall survival did not differ in M-S (44.3 weeks, N = 7) than M-O (44.7 weeks, N = 4; p=0.8). In conclusion, we demonstrate sex-based differences in survival in an autochthonous genetically engineered mouse model of gastric cancer, consistent with clinical observations that female human patients have improved overall survival than female patients. Our findings implicate the immune system as potential mediators of these differences. Preliminary data suggests hormone deprivation impacts overall survival of female mice, but not male mice. Future work is directed at identifying the molecular mechanism between female sex, sex hormones, and improved overall survival. Citation Format: Ryan T. Heslin, Shu Xiao, Morgan F. Pettigrew, Nafeesah Fatimah, Hsien-Tsung Lai, Suntrea T.G. Hammer, Sam C. Wang. Unraveling the sexually dimorphic immune microenvironment in gastric cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Mechanisms of Cancer Immunity and Cancer-related Autoimmunity; 2025 Sep 24-27; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2025;13(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PR-14.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".