Bibliographic record
Abstract
As cities lined up for the opportunity to host the 1972 Winter Olympic Games, Calgary/Banff, which had finished second to Grenoble in bidding for the 1968 Games, was considered the front-runner. But IOC President Avery Brundage, was inundated with letters from determined local residents opposed to the Calgary/Banff bid. Brundage was “at a loss to understand the attitude of the Banff people,” but as he told James Worrall, president of the Canadian Olympic Association, he had been “deluged with letters of protest against the Banff site from Canadian citizens and organizations.” These organizations included the Canadian Society of Wildlife and Fishery Biologists, which passed a resolution at its April 1965 Annual Meeting opposing the construction of sports facilities in Banff National Park as these were “incompatible with the primary function of National Parks” and “would cause serious localized changes in the environment.” Similarly, the World Wildlife Fund publicly regretted what it perceived to be Canada’s repudiation of nearly a century’s worth of leadership in parkland preservation. This chapter examines the key actors and issues in this largely unexplored moment in Canadian sporting and social justice history, focusing in particular on debates framing Banff National Park as recreational space versus a natural environment in need of protection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".