MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414475609 · doi:10.1007/s44443-025-00200-5

Source-free cross-modality medical image synthesis with diffusion priors

2025· article· en· W4414475609 on OpenAlexaff
Jia Chen, Xin Wang, Jun Bai, Kai Yang, Xinrong Hu, Li Yue

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPrior probabilityFidelityImage (mathematics)ScalabilitySource codeSolverEncoding (memory)Medical imagingSynthetic dataPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cross-modality medical image synthesis plays a critical role in enabling comprehensive multi-modal diagnosis and treatment. However, existing methods are constrained by their reliance on paired or unpaired source-target data, limiting scalability and practical deployment. Generating high-fidelity medical images in a truly source-free setting, where no source-domain data is accessible, remains a significant and underexplored challenge. To fill this gap, we propose Diffusion Prior Synthesis and Optimization (DPSO), a novel source-free, diffusion-based framework that performs cross-modality medical image synthesis using only single-modality target data, without requiring supervision or statistical priors from the source domain. DPSO adopts a decoupled architecture via a Probability Flow ODE (PF-ODE) formulation that separates source encoding from target generation. A general-domain diffusion model maps notional source images into a shared latent space, independent of source-domain supervision. This latent representation is then decoded into the target modality using a PF-ODE solver guided by a target-specific prior. An additional optimization stage, also driven by the target prior, further refines the outputs to enhance fidelity and robustness. Experiments on the IXI Dataset and SynthRAD2023 demonstrate that DPSO achieves competitive performance across diverse cross-modality tasks, comparable to methods using paired or unpaired source data. Notably, DPSO removes the need for source modality data entirely, offering a flexible and scalable solution for truly source-free cross-modality medical image synthesis. Code is available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DPSO-64DF

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of King Saud University - Computer and Information SciencesSame topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207