FL-SMPC++: A robust framework for privacy-preserving federated learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Federated Learning (FL) offers a promising paradigm for privacy-preserving collaborative training, yet it remains highly vulnerable to adversarial behaviors, client unreliability, and challenges associated with non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) data. Existing secure aggregation techniques, while preserving confidentiality, fail to guarantee the integrity and trustworthiness of model updates, leaving FL deployments exposed to poisoning and consistency attacks. This work introduces FL-SMPC++, a robust and privacy-preserving FL framework designed to address these challenges. The primary objective is to develop a scalable solution that ensures verifiable, privacy-preserving aggregation while mitigating malicious client behaviors, dropouts, and data heterogeneity. Our approach integrates Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC), Pedersen commitments, and zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) to cryptographically bind clients' submitted updates to their validation outcomes without revealing private data. We propose a dynamic client selection strategy based on shared validation performance, a dropout-tolerant threshold aggregation protocol, and a warm-up initialization phase to counteract non-IID distributions. Comprehensive experiments on MNIST, CIFAR-10, FEMNIST, and UCI Heart Disease show that FL-SMPC++ consistently outperforms FedAvg, FedProx, and FedNova. For example, under a label-flipping attack with 30% malicious clients on CIFAR-10 (non-IID), FL-SMPC++ achieves 78.9% accuracy compared to 67.4% for FedAvg, representing an absolute gain of 11.5%. Across datasets, the framework limits accuracy degradation to 6–8% under attack, while baselines suffer 13–20% losses. These results demonstrate that FL-SMPC++ achieves strong cryptographic privacy guarantees together with empirically validated resilience and convergence, offering a scalable and practical blueprint for trustworthy FL in adversarial and resource-constrained environments. • A novel FL framework combines SMPC, commitments, and zero-knowledge proofs. • Ensures submitted model updates match validated ones without revealing them. • Uses dynamic validation for secure and fair client selection. • Tolerates client dropouts using a threshold-based aggregation mechanism. • Outperforms baseline FL methods under adversarial and non-IID conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".