MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414475895 · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107380

FL-SMPC++: A robust framework for privacy-preserving federated learning

2025· article· en· W4414475895 on OpenAlexaff
Omar Dib, Shiyun Li, Rouwaida Abdallah, El-hacen Diallo

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersWenzhou-Kean University
KeywordsScalabilityFederated learningInitializationAdversarial systemResilience (materials science)Consistency (knowledge bases)CryptographyInformation privacyKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Federated Learning (FL) offers a promising paradigm for privacy-preserving collaborative training, yet it remains highly vulnerable to adversarial behaviors, client unreliability, and challenges associated with non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) data. Existing secure aggregation techniques, while preserving confidentiality, fail to guarantee the integrity and trustworthiness of model updates, leaving FL deployments exposed to poisoning and consistency attacks. This work introduces FL-SMPC++, a robust and privacy-preserving FL framework designed to address these challenges. The primary objective is to develop a scalable solution that ensures verifiable, privacy-preserving aggregation while mitigating malicious client behaviors, dropouts, and data heterogeneity. Our approach integrates Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC), Pedersen commitments, and zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) to cryptographically bind clients' submitted updates to their validation outcomes without revealing private data. We propose a dynamic client selection strategy based on shared validation performance, a dropout-tolerant threshold aggregation protocol, and a warm-up initialization phase to counteract non-IID distributions. Comprehensive experiments on MNIST, CIFAR-10, FEMNIST, and UCI Heart Disease show that FL-SMPC++ consistently outperforms FedAvg, FedProx, and FedNova. For example, under a label-flipping attack with 30% malicious clients on CIFAR-10 (non-IID), FL-SMPC++ achieves 78.9% accuracy compared to 67.4% for FedAvg, representing an absolute gain of 11.5%. Across datasets, the framework limits accuracy degradation to 6–8% under attack, while baselines suffer 13–20% losses. These results demonstrate that FL-SMPC++ achieves strong cryptographic privacy guarantees together with empirically validated resilience and convergence, offering a scalable and practical blueprint for trustworthy FL in adversarial and resource-constrained environments. • A novel FL framework combines SMPC, commitments, and zero-knowledge proofs. • Ensures submitted model updates match validated ones without revealing them. • Uses dynamic validation for secure and fair client selection. • Tolerates client dropouts using a threshold-based aggregation mechanism. • Outperforms baseline FL methods under adversarial and non-IID conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.124
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.124
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0160.037
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResults in EngineeringSame topicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataFrench-language works237,207