MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CTNNA3 and MBP Mediate Treatment Resistance Through Tumor Microenvironment Remodeling in Recurrent Glioblastoma

2025· article· en· W4414476958 on OpenAlexaff
Wen Mao

Bibliographic record

VenueTheoretical and Natural Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSignaling Pathways in Disease
Canadian institutionsMilton District Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtracellular matrixTumor microenvironmentGlioblastomaPrimary tumorPopulationDiseaseBrain tumorMechanism (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glioblastoma multiforme represents the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults, with a 90% 2-year recurrence rate despite standard therapy of surgical resection followed by chemo- and radiotherapy. Yet, the cellular mechanisms underlying therapeutic resistance remain poorly understood. By integrating analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing results of 41 primary and 43 recurrent tumor specimens with experimental validation, we identify neuro-oligodendrocyte precursors as the predominant cellular population driving tumor recurrence through establishment of protective microenvironmental niches. We discover that CTNNA3 and MBP exhibit paradoxical roles in promoting survival in primary tumors while conferring chemoresistance in recurrent GBM, revealing that these factors determine treatment efficacy rather than directly driving relapse. Functional assays confirmed their role as mediators of extracellular matrix remodeling, establishing a mechanistic link between tumor microenvironmental remodeling and therapeutic resistance. By revealing how recurrent tumors engineer self-protective niches, our study provides a new framework for developing combination therapies that disrupt these resistance mechanisms and provides foundation for overcoming treatment failure in this universally fatal disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheoretical and Natural ScienceSame topicSignaling Pathways in DiseaseFrench-language works237,207