MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414477066 · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105943

A mouse model of HIV in pregnancy: the EcoHIV+ pregnancy model

2025· article· en· W4414477066 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Maud Collomb, Lena Serghides

Bibliographic record

VenueEBioMedicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity Health NetworkToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsPregnancyPandemicHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)SalaryMEDLINECoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Research articleMaternal healthMedical research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: HIV infection during pregnancy poses risks to maternal and foetal health. Identifying underlying mechanisms can be challenging in humans. While humanised mouse models exist, they are unsuitable for pregnancy research, highlighting the need for alternative models. Here we introduce a mouse pregnancy model using infection with EcoHIV, a chimeric ecotropic HIV virus. METHODS: pg/mL EcoHIV, or mock infected, either 7 days prior to mating, or on gestational day (GD) 11.5. Dam weight gain was monitored. Pregnant dams were euthanised on GD14.5 or GD18.5. Foetal and placenta weights, foetal viability, litter size and resorptions were recorded. Placenta efficiency (foetal to placental weight ratio) was calculated. Infection was assessed using HIV Gag expression quantified by qPCR in RNA isolated from maternal blood, spleen, and foetal body. FINDINGS: EcoHIV infection was detectable in 90% of dams infected prior to pregnancy and 100% of dams infected during pregnancy. Maternal weight gain was lower in EcoHIV infected mice, with the greatest reduction seen in those infected during pregnancy. EcoHIV infection was associated with significantly lower foetal weight, higher placenta weight, and lower placenta efficiency compared to controls at GD18.5. Perinatal EcoHIV transmission occurred in a portion of foetuses, with litter average transmission rates ranging from 3.1% with infection during pregnancy to 17.9% with infection prior to pregnancy. INTERPRETATION: The EcoHIV pregnancy model mimics clinical aspects and can be a valuable tool to understand HIV infection in pregnancy and its consequences on maternal and foetal health. FUNDING: This project has been funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (award # PJT-180630, PJH-192202, HAL-157984). MR received salary support from NSERC/CIHR Canada Graduate Scholarship, Institute of Medical Science Fellowship Award, and Emerging & Pandemic Infections Consortium (EPIC) Doctoral Award. LS holds a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Maternal-Child Health and HIV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEBioMedicineSame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207