MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414477187 · doi:10.3390/diagnostics15192433

Diagnostic Efficacy of Olfactory Function Test Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy with Machine Learning in Healthy Adults: A Prospective Diagnostic-Accuracy (Feasibility/Validation) Study in Healthy Adults with Algorithm Development

2025· article· en· W4414477187 on OpenAlexaff
Seonghyun Kim, Dong Keon Yon, Jaewon Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueDiagnostics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersMinistry of SMEs and StartupsMinistry of Trade, Industry and Energy
KeywordsReceiver operating characteristicClassifier (UML)Artificial neural networkIdentification (biology)Task (project management)Sensory thresholdSensitivity (control systems)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: The YSK olfactory function (YOF) test is a culturally adapted psychophysical tool that assesses threshold, discrimination, and identification. This study evaluated whether functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) synchronized with routine YOF testing, combined with machine learning, can predict YOF subdomain performance in healthy adults, providing an objective neural correlate to complement behavioral testing. Methods: In this prospective diagnostic-accuracy (feasibility/validation) study in healthy adults with algorithm development, 100 healthy adults completed the YOF test while undergoing prefrontal/orbitofrontal fNIRS during odor blocks. Feature sets from ΔHbO/ΔHbR included time-domain descriptors, complexity (Lempel–Ziv), and information-theoretic measures (mutual information); the identification task used a hybrid attention–CNN. Separate models were developed for threshold (binary classification), discrimination (binary classification), and identification (binary classification). Performance was summarized with accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), F1-score, and (where applicable) sensitivity/specificity, using participant-level cross-validation. Results: The threshold classifier achieved accuracy 0.86, AUC 0.86, and F1 0.86, indicating strong discrimination of correct vs. incorrect threshold responses. The discrimination model yielded accuracy 0.75, AUC 0.76, and F1 0.75. The identification model (attention–convolutional neural network [CNN]) achieved accuracy 0.88, sensitivity 0.86, specificity 0.91, and F1 0.88. Feature-attribution (e.g., SHapley Additive exPlanations [SHAP]) provided interpretable links between fNIRS features and task performance for threshold and discrimination. Conclusions: Olfactory-evoked fNIRS signals can accurately predict YOF subdomain performance in healthy adults, supporting the feasibility of non-invasive, portable, near–real-time olfactory monitoring. These findings are preliminary and not generalizable to clinical populations; external validation in diverse cohorts is warranted. The approach clarifies the scientific essence of the method by (i) aligning psychophysical outcomes with objective hemodynamic signatures and (ii) introducing a feature-rich modeling pipeline (ΔHbO/ΔHbR + Lempel–Ziv complexity/mutual information; attention–CNN) that advances prior work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiagnosticsSame topicOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesFrench-language works237,207