MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Trends in Health Care Services Use and Mortality in Adults With Cardiometabolic Diseases During the First Year of the Pandemic in Ontario, Canada

2025· article· en· W4414479553 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tetyana Kendzerska, M Saymeh, Michael Pugliese, Marcus Povitz, Brandon Robinson, Jodi D. Edwards, Teresa To, Andrea S. Gershon

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreCarleton UniversityUniversity of CalgaryOttawa HospitalPublic Health OntarioHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicHealth careDiabetes mellitusMEDLINECoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Health services researchHealth servicesPublic healthEpidemiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted health services, particularly affecting individuals with cardiometabolic diseases. This study compared health care use and mortality trends in adults with cardiometabolic diseases during the first pandemic year. It also examined associations between changes in outpatient visits and diagnostic tests with acute health care utilization and mortality. METHODS: Using health administrative databases, we conducted a retrospective population-based study using an open-cohort sampling on adult (≥18 years of age) Ontario residents with a prior diagnosis of angina, congestive heart failure, hypertension, or diabetes between January 2016 and March 2021. During the pandemic’s first year (March 2020–March 2021), observed (per 100 000 at-risk) versus projected event rates were compared for all-cause outpatient visits, diagnostic testing, emergency department visits, hospitalizations and mortality across the 4 time periods. Auto-regressive integrated moving-average models were used to calculate projected rates from observed monthly rates from similar periods pre-COVID (January 2016–December 2019). Quasi-Poisson models examined interactions between care access and acute outcomes. RESULTS: In the first pandemic quarter, rates of outpatient visits, diagnostic testing, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations for adults with cardiometabolic diseases decreased. By year-end, outpatient visits exceeded projections for angina, congestive heart failure, and diabetes, while most diagnostic test rates remained below projections. Mortality was as projected, except in adults with hypertension during the first quarter (observed 54 964 versus projected, 50 134 [95% CI, 46 686–53 840]). In adults with diabetes and hypertension, fewer cardiac investigations and echocardiograms were associated with greater mortality than prepandemic (interaction P <0.01). Unlike other populations, diabetes and hypertension patients showed reduced emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and mortality during months with the highest virtual care use ( P <0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic impacted health care utilization and mortality for adults with cardiometabolic diseases. Access to diagnostic testing is critical, particularly for those with diabetes and hypertension. Virtual care may benefit frequent health care users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and OutcomesSame topicCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsFrench-language works237,207