MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414487968 · doi:10.4103/sjg.sjg_256_25

Achalasia management with per-oral endoscopic myotomy: A study of clinical success and complications at a tertiary center in Saudi Arabia

2025· article· en· W4414487968 on OpenAlexaff
Abdulrahman Alfadda, Abdullah Alqaraawi, Aymen Almuhaidb, Khalid Al Kahtani, Faisal Mohammed Alyahya, Mohmmed Alzomia, Adnan Almahrouq, Musthafa Peedikayil

Bibliographic record

VenueSaudi Journal of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAchalasiaGERDMyotomyComplicationAdverse effectRetrospective cohort studyCohortReferralTertiary referral hospital

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for achalasia, with growing global adoption. However, regional data from Saudi Arabia are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of POEM in a tertiary referral center in Riyadh. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients with achalasia who underwent POEM at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre between April 2017 and October 2023. Diagnosis was confirmed by high-resolution manometry and classified using the Chicago Classification v3.0 or v4.0. Clinical success was defined as an Eckardt score ≤3 at follow-up. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and need for further intervention. Results: A total of 105 patients (mean age 41.2 ± 13.9 years; 50.5% male) underwent POEM. The majority had type II achalasia (77.1%), followed by type III (12.4%) and type I (10.5%). Prior interventions were recorded in 25.7% of patients. Clinical success was achieved in 77.1%, with a significant reduction in mean Eckardt score (6.8 ± 2.3 to 1.8 ± 1.7; P < 0.001). The median follow-up was 1118 days. Patient satisfaction (≥80% symptom relief) was 69.5%. Complications occurred in 26.7%, predominantly gas-related events, with no procedure-related mortality. Major adverse events were rare (perforation 1.9%, reoperation 1.9%). Post-POEM GERD was confirmed in 24.4% of those tested with the Ph study, and 58.8% required proton pump inhibitor therapy at follow-up. Comparative analysis across time periods showed no significant difference in complication rates, although hospital stay was longer in the later cohort. Multivariable analysis did not identify independent predictors of clinical success. Conclusion: POEM is a safe and effective treatment for achalasia in Saudi Arabia, achieving substantial symptom relief with acceptable complication rates, consistent with international experience. The notable incidence of post-procedure GERD underscores the need for long-term reflux monitoring and management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.537

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSaudi Journal of GastroenterologySame topicGastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207