MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414492320 · doi:10.22323/1.501.1088

Status update of various simulation components for P-ONE.

2025· article· en· W4414492320 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Cristina Lagunas Gualda, N. Whitehorn, T. DeYoung, M. U. Nisa, V. A. Parrish, Daniel Salazar-Gallegos, J. Garriz, Jean Pierre Twagirayezu, C. Weaver, C. Bellenghi, M. Boehmer, M. Brandenburg, Simeon Bash, V. Gousy-Leblanc, L. Ginzkey, Ruohan Li, K. Leismüller, László Papp, P. Pfahler, S. Magel, B. Nührenbörger, R. Ørsøe, E. Resconi, A. Scholz, Christian Spannfellner, S. Loipolder, Tobias Kerscher, L. Winter, R. Halliday, Adrian Ponce, Franz Fuchs, I. Taboada, M. Agostini, B. Crudele, A. Alexander Wight, G. Marshall, A. Rahlin, P. S. Barbeau, A. Zaalishvili, N. Cedarblade-Jones, D. R. Grant, M. Danninger, Felix Henningsen, C. Miller, P. Krause, Andreas Gärtner, D. Ghuman, Jakub Stacho, R. C. Nichol, A. Grimes, T. Glukler, C. Kopper, C. Haack, L. Schumacher, Pa. Malecki, K. Kopański, Shraddha Karanth, W. Noga, Shiv K. Sharma, R. Wroński, Roger Moore, C. B. Krauss, S. Robertson, Juan Pablo Yáñez, M. Rangen, N. Molberg, B. Veenstra, Torge Martin, N. Kurahashi, W. G. Kang, B. Pirenne, M. Heesemann, Lanfranco Muzi, D. Hembroff, S. Agreda, Jeffrey Hutchinson, P. Bunton, E. Price, Andrew J. Baron, B. Biffard, Matthew Charlton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaUK Research and InnovationDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftCanada First Research Excellence FundNational Science Foundation
KeywordsNeutrinoTelescopeCherenkov radiationCascadeNeutrino detectorNeutrino oscillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Pacific Ocean Neutrino Experiment (P-ONE) is a planned cubic-kilometer-scale Cherenkov neutrino telescope that will be deployed off the West Coast of Canada. To evaluate the perfor- mance of the telescope and support future analyses, it is essential to have accurate simulations of neutrino interactions and background sources. This contribution provides an overview of the current status of various components used in water-based neutrino telescope simulation. These include characterization and simulation of backgrounds, including 40K decays and biolumines- cence, studies on the simulation of muons, neutrinos, and cascade generation, as well as new photon propagation techniques. In particular, emphasis will be given to recent developments that are tailored specifically for P-ONE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207