MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414493500 · doi:10.1080/10888438.2025.2561985

Charting the Shift: Age as a Moderator of the Genetic and Environmental Influences on Reading

2025· article· en· W4414493500 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Callie W. Little, Hope Sparks Lancaster, Rachelle Margaret Johnson, Patrick C. Kennedy, Jeanette Taylor, Colleen M. Ganley, Wendy Johnson, Sara A. Hart

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Studies of Reading · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicReading and Literacy Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada
KeywordsModerationReading (process)Reading comprehensionChild developmentStatistical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Reading skill is influenced by genes and environments throughout life. This study focused on the changes in heritability and environmental influences across the early to middle years of reading development. Reading theory suggests there is a shift from learning to read to reading to learn at approximately age 8. Based on the bioecological theory and gene-environment-time framework, as environmental influences stabilize we expected shared environmental influences to decrease and genetic influences to increase. Methods: Using a twin sample in the USA (N = 1086 individuals; 564 Male: 522 Female; Age M = 7.46 years, SD = 1.57, with 90% of families self-reported as White, 8% Black, 1% Asian, 1% Alaskan, Native American, or Native Pacific Islander, and 11% self-reported as Hispanic), we used a Gene-by-Environment (GxE) twin model with age as a moderator to examine how the balance of genetic and environmental influences on reading skill differed by age. Reading skill was measured with the DIBELS Next Composite from the beginning of academic year 2018/19. We estimated assessment age assuming the same fall test date for all participants. Results: We observed small increasing genetic influences and larger decreasing shared environmental influences on reading skill from ages 5 to 7 that began to plateau at approximately age 8. Non-shared environmental influences on reading skill were low and relatively stable from ages 6 through 12 following an uptick between ages 5 and 6. Conclusion: Results are consistent with the bioecological framework and the emerging gene-environment-time model. There were changes in the genetic and environmental influences on reading around the time that children began formal school-based instruction that began to level off during the shift from learning to read to reading to learn. Future work should identify specific environmental factors at these developmental windows to guide reading policies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Studies of ReadingSame topicReading and Literacy DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207