MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414498862 · doi:10.46254/na10.20250322

Industrial-Aero Optimization for Agile Rocket Cargo Delivery: Logistics

2025· article· en· W4414498862 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Marwen Elkamel, Luis Rabelo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRocket and propulsion systems research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Air ForceUniversity of WaterlooUniversidad Tecnológica de PanamáUniversity of Central FloridaU.S. Department of DefenseUniversity of MissouriFlorida Institute of TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsAgile software developmentRocket (weapon)Supply chainDroneComponent (thermodynamics)Plan (archaeology)AdaptabilityResource (disambiguation)Key (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Topics Supply Chain and Logistics Industrial-Aero Optimization for Agile Rocket Cargo Delivery: Logistics Space-delivered cargo systems via rockets offer rapid, global-scale delivery for humanitarian purposes. While rocketry is a significant challenge, the project focuses on identifying and solving ground logistical bottlenecks to ensure the swift delivery of essential supplies during critical missions. The logistics component involves advanced infrastructure planning, data-driven decision-making, and simulations to optimize the supply chain. Using mathematical modeling, automation, and predictive analytics, the project aims to enhance cargo processing, rocket scheduling, warehousing, and resource allocation for future spaceports. Research also explores cost-effective facility upgrades and the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for mission planning, creating a scalable and efficient framework for space cargo delivery. Key areas of focus include: Infrastructure Research: Upgrading facilities to support next-gen vehicles and improve operational coordination. Warehouse & Logistics: Repurposing legacy infrastructure and optimizing facility sighting for safety and efficiency. Cargo Distribution & Operational Readiness: Establishing FEMA-like Points of Delivery (PODs) for efficient cargo distribution and using simulations to optimize logistics. Cost Engineering: Evaluating and modernizing facilities to balance compliance, cost, scalability, and effectiveness. Launch Pad Optimization & Advanced Technologies: Using Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) for optimal launch pad placement and integrating AI and LLMs for enhanced mission planning and real-time decision-making. AI and large language models for space mission: planning integration of LLM's real time decision making and mission adaptability and fine-tuned private LLM's. This comprehensive approach ensures a robust, cost-effective, and efficient system for rapid space cargo delivery. Keywords Rocket Cargo, warehouse, logistics, optimization

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRocket and propulsion systems researchFrench-language works237,207