Passivity-Based Gradient-Play Dynamics for Distributed Generalized Nash Equilibrium Seeking
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider seeking generalized Nash equilibria (GNE) for noncooperative games with coupled nonlinear constraints over networks. We first revisit a well-known gradient-play dynamics from a passivity-based perspective, and address that the strict monotonicity of the pseudo-gradient is a critical assumption to ensure the exact convergence of the dynamics. Then we propose two novel passivity-based gradient-play dynamics by introducing parallel feedforward compensators (PFCs) and output feedback compensators (OFCs). We show that the proposed dynamics can reach exact GNEs in merely monotone regimes if the PFCs are strictly passive or if the OFCs are output strictly passive. Following that, resorting to passivity, we develop a unifying framework to generalize the gradient-play dynamics, and moreover, design a class of explicit dynamics with convergence guarantees. In addition, we explore the relation between the proposed dynamics and some existing methods, and extend our results to partial-decision information settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it