Fast segmentation with the NextBrain histological atlas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Structural brain analysis at the subregion level offers critical insights into healthy aging and neurodegenerative diseases. The NextBrain histological atlas was recently introduced to support such fine-grained investigations, but its existing Bayesian segmentation framework remains computationally prohibitive, particularly for large-scale studies. We present a new, open-source tool that dramatically accelerates segmentation using a hybrid approach combining: machine learning, contrast-adaptive segmentation; target-specific image synthesis; and fast diffeomorphic registration (all three with GPU support). Our method enables highly granular segmentation of brain MRI scans of any resolution and contrast (in vivo or ex vivo) at a fraction of the computational cost of the original method (<5 minutes on a GPU). We validate our tool on four different modalities (in vivo MRI, ex vivo MRI, HiP-CT, and photography) across a total of approximately 4,000 brain scans. Our results demonstrate that the accelerated approach achieves comparable accuracy to the original method in terms of Dice scores, while reducing runtime by over an order of magnitude. This work enables high-resolution anatomical analysis at unprecedented scale and flexibility, providing a practical solution for large neuroimaging studies. Our tool is publicly available in FreeSurfer (https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HistoAtlasSegmentation).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".