Longitudinal Findings From a Land-Based HIV Prevention Study With Northern and Indigenous Youth, Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The high prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the Northwest Territories (NWT), Canada underscores the need for culturally relevant, community-driven sexual health initiatives for HIV and STI prevention that prioritize youth engagement and Indigenous leadership. FOXY (Fostering Open eXpression among Youth), a Northern and Indigenous NWT-based community-based organization, conducted 1-week youth Peer Leader Retreats (PLRs) focused on HIV prevention and leadership using land- and arts-based approaches. We conducted a one-group pretest/posttest with youth PLR participants aged 13 to 17 in the NWT and combined the data across PLRs conducted from 2020 to 2022. Assessments were completed at preretreat baseline, immediately postretreat, and at 6-month follow-up to measure changes in study outcomes (safer sex self-efficacy [SSSE], condom use self-efficacy [CUSE], and HIV knowledge). Of n = 133 participants at baseline, 6-month follow-up data were available for n = 122 (92%) participants. Multivariate analyses showed significant improvements in all study outcomes from baseline to 6-month follow-up. SSSE, CUSE, and HIV knowledge scores increased postretreat and continued to improve at 6 months. These findings suggest that culturally relevant, community-driven peer leadership interventions hold promise in advancing HIV prevention cascade outcomes with Northern and Indigenous youth in the NWT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it