MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414511256 · doi:10.1186/s12888-025-07323-z

Leveraging multigenerational health data to enhance mental disorder risk prediction: a population-based cohort study

2025· article· en· W4414511256 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Amani F. Hamad, Barret A. Monchka, James M. Bolton, Leslíe L. Roos, Mohamed Elgendi, Lisa M. Lix

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Psychiatry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaManitoba HealthGeorge & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchWinnipeg Foundation
KeywordsMental healthAlcohol use disorderGrandparentCohortLogistic regressionCohort studyPrevalence of mental disordersBrier score

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Mental disorders are highly prevalent, and comorbidities between physical and mental health conditions are common. Physical comorbidities and family health histories may improve the accuracy of mental disorder risk prediction. We developed prediction models for mental disorder risk using comprehensive individual and family mental and physical health histories. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using administrative Health data in Manitoba, Canada, and included adults between 1977 and 2020 with linkages to at least one parent and one grandparent. Mental disorders (mood and anxiety, substance use and psychotic disorders) for individuals, parents and grandparents were identified in inpatient and outpatient Health records. Predictors included demographics, family history of mental disorders and 130 health conditions in individuals, parents and grandparents. We used the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) logistic regression to build prediction models that sequentially included health conditions in individuals, parents and grandparents. Predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and Brier score. RESULTS: Of 125 070 individuals identified, 109 359 had no preexisting mental disorder. 52.9% were males and 52.8% were urban residents. 39 651 (36.3%) had a recorded diagnosis of mental disorders during follow-up. Predictive models incorporating Health histories of individuals, parents, and grandparents achieved the best predictive performance. Amongst all mental disorders, psychotic and substance use disorders had the highest AUCs of 0.78 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75–0.81) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.73–0.76), respectively. Key predictors included comorbid mental disorders, gastrointestinal conditions, female infertility and family history of dementia, gastrointestinal and metabolic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Individual and family histories of physical and mental conditions improved mental disorder risk prediction, though accuracy was only moderate, highlighting the need for further refinement of risk prediction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC PsychiatrySame topicHealth disparities and outcomesFrench-language works237,207