El principio estructural sobre la prohibición de amenaza o uso de la fuerza: retos y peligros actuales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La prohibición de la amenaza o uso de la fuerza constituye uno de los principios fundamentales del Derecho internacional, hasta el punto de ser calificado como la piedra angular de todo el ordenamiento por su papel esencial en el funcionamiento de todo el sistema internacional. En este conversatorio, diferentes especialistas examinan algunos de los principales retos y amenazas que enfrenta en la actualidad, a saber, el papel del Consejo de Seguridad respecto a la prohibición, la crisis actual de las operaciones de mantenimiento de la paz, su relación con la responsabilidad de proteger, su aplicación en el ciberespacio y en el espacio ultraterrestre, los usos de la fuerza contra misiones diplomáticas y consulares, las implicaciones de la doctrina unwilling or unable y, finalmente, el riesgo que supone la pasividad de los Estados frente a su violación.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".