Repeats mimic pathogen-associated patterns across a vast evolutionary landscape
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An emerging hallmark of many human diseases is transcription of typically silenced repetitive DNA containing pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). These PAMPs engage the innate immune system via pattern recognition receptors (PRRs)-a phenomenon known as viral mimicry. We propose a statistical physics framework to quantify viral mimicry by measuring "selective forces" that enrich PAMPs compared to a genome-wide reference distribution. We validate our predictions by identifying repeats that bind different PRRs and show potential viral mimics in different repeat families across eukaryotic genomes, suggesting shared mechanisms drive emergence and retention. We propose two non-exclusive evolutionary hypotheses. The first "repeat-centric" hypothesis posits PAMPs are integral to the repeat life cycle and are therefore enriched as they mediate repeat expansion. The second "organism-centric" hypothesis proposes viral mimicry functions as a cell-intrinsic feedback mechanism for sensing and reacting to transcriptional dysregulation, which provides a selective pressure to maintain PAMPs in genomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it