MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414517792 · doi:10.1016/j.epsc.2025.103116

Hybrid interventional radiological and surgical approach to treat biliary obstruction post Kasai portoenterostomy: A case report

2025· article· en· W4414517792 on OpenAlexaff
Anand Dhatt, Ravjot Dhatt, Erik D. Skarsgard, Manraj K. S. Heran

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)CholestasisPercutaneousAnastomosisRadiological weaponInterventional radiologyBiliary tract

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kasai procedure is used in the management of biliary atresia. Complications can include structuring at anastomoses which can result in impeded bile flow and subsequently ascending cholangitis that requires management. We present a case of a 4-years old with multiple episodes of ascending cholangitis in the context of prior Kasai portoenterostomy at day 56 of life for non-syndromic biliary atresia. After prolonged hospital admission, imaging in the form of US and MR-cholangiopancreatography showed an obliterated portoenterostomy. A combined surgical and Interventional Radiology approach was utilized in the form of the surgical creation loop jejunostomy within the Roux limb and then traversing of the portoenterostomy under fluoroscopically to dilate the stricture and place an internal-external biliary drain. Subsequently, the patient’s hyperbilirubinemia resolved with no further episodes of ascending cholangitis in 3 years of follow-up. A hybrid, percutaneous and surgical approach is a feasible option to restore bile flow in patients post-Kasai who develop delayed cholestasis due to obliteration of the portoenterostomy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric Surgery Case ReportsSame topicPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207