Bibliographic record
Abstract
Durante mucho tiempo las lesbianas fueron prácticamente invisibles en las ciudades de la península ibérica, difícilmente tenían lugares o cartografías, y apenas se las asociaba con imágenes o imaginarios. En el Estado Español, el franquismo contribuyó enormemente a esta invisibilización. Pero la ocupación del espacio urbano por una identidad es esencial para que ésta pueda construirse como sujeto político y social. A partir de la Transición, con los primeros grupos de activistas lesbofeministas, y durante las décadas de 80 y 90, las lesbianas empiezan un proceso de transformación de su condición de invisibilidad, acompañado de un impulso de autorrepresentación, en las calles de ciudades como Bilbao, Barcelona o Madrid. Estas fotografías se encuentran mayoritariamente en posesión de las fotógrafas y fotografiadas, en cajones y fondos de armario. En este artículo empezamos a sacarlas a la luz, a analizar y reflexionar sobre sus efectos hoy, buscando abrir contra imaginarios urbanos en la Península
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.049 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".