MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414521246 · doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.183992

Microstructure and magnetic properties of additively manufactured NdFeB magnets by cold spray

2025· article· en· W4414521246 on OpenAlexafffund
Nuo Qu, Jean-Michel Lamarre, Fabrice Bernier, Shaochang Song, S.S. Dash, Lizhong Lang, Youliang He, Yu Zou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Alloys and Compounds · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties of Alloys
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsNeodymium magnetCoercivityMicrostructureRemanenceMagnetSinteringDemagnetizing field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neodymium iron boron (NdFeB) permanent magnets are ubiquitous components in compact electromagnetic devices that demand high energy density for high efficiency. Commercial manufacturing approaches such as sintering and hot deformation yield excellent magnetic performance, while bonding methods offer geometric freedom at reduced thermal exposure. Cold spray, initially a coating technique, is an emerging solid-state additive manufacturing method that deposits metal powder via high-velocity impact without melting. However, cold-sprayed NdFeB magnets show inferior magnetic performance compared to sintered or hot deformed magnets, and the reasons causing such deterioration of magnetic properties are not completely understood. In this study, we use aluminum as the binder to manufacture bonded NdFeB magnets by cold spray and investigate the microstructure features, such as phases, oxidation, and crack formation, affect the magnetic performance. Compared with the raw NdFeB powder, the as-deposited magnet exhibited decreased coercivity (from 780 kA/m to ~658 kA/m) and remanence (from 0.88 T to ~0.45 T). Electron probe microanalysis revealed localized oxidation at cracks, suggesting the decomposition of the Nd 2 Fe 14 B phase which generates non-favorable sites for reverse-domain nucleation. The X-ray diffraction and Williamson - Hall analysis indicated about ~0.8% of average micro-strain in the deposited material, promoting lattice distortion partial phase decomposition in the NdFeB powder during the cold spray process. This study improves our understanding of the high-strain rate deformation of NdFeB powders cold spray processing, opening new pathways for efficient, scalable, and energy-saving magnet manufacturing. • Cold-spray yields near-dense NdFeB-Al magnets that still lose 6–16% coercivity and 40–50% remanence. • XRD analysis shows impact induced microstrain around 0.8%, enabling defect-assisted nucleation in nano scale grains driving coercivity decrease. • Aluminium dilution plus closed porosity lowers remanence in line with a rule-of-mixtures estimate. • Crack-centred oxidation partially decomposes Nd 2 Fe 14 B phase, cutting hard-phase fraction, and further weakening magnetic properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Alloys and CompoundsSame topicMagnetic Properties of AlloysFrench-language works237,207