κ <sup>2</sup> <i>‐N</i> , <i>N</i> ′‐Sulfurdiimide and κ <sup>1</sup> ‐ <i>O</i> ‐Sulfinylamine Complexes of Tin(IV) Chloride
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A series of Sn(IV) chloride complexes with sulfur diimide (SDI, R‐NSN‐R) ligands are presented, including structural characterization of first‐in‐class complexes of bidentate diaryl‐SDIs, [SnCl 4 {κ 2 ‐ N , N ′‐S(NAr) 2 }] (Ar = 4‐X‐C 6 H 4 ‐), and an oxygen‐coordinated sulfinylamine, [SnCl 4 {κ 1 ‐ O ‐OSNPh} 2 ]. As part of the comprehensive experimental and DFT computational investigation, 119 Sn NMR analysis revealed a dynamic exchange equilibrium in acetonitrile between SDI ligands and solvent, providing insight into their complicated solution‐state chemical and electrochemical behavior. Voltammetric experiments show that, despite this dynamic equilibrium, the SDI ligands appear to suppress typical Sn(IV) reduction pathways. While tentative due to the complex behavior, this suggests that SDIs are functioning as redox‐active (RA) ligands. In conjunction with our previous systematic characterization of diaryl‐SDIs, these findings highlight their potential as an easily derivatized and highly redox‐tunable category of RA ligand and emphatically warrant further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it