Integrated High-Voltage Bidirectional Protection Switches with Overcurrent Protection: Review and Design Guide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protecting sensitive electronic interfaces is critical in industrial applications, where exposure to harsh conditions and fault events is common. This paper reviews and compares circuit techniques for the design of bidirectional protection switches, highlighting key features such as analog switching, high-voltage capability, thermal shutdown, galvanic input isolation, and adjustable current limiting. Based on this review, we propose a universal architecture that combines the most suitable building blocks identified in the literature, with a focus on options that would enable monolithic integration in high-voltage silicon-on-insulator (SOI) technology and capable of delivering up to 2 A at a maximum voltage of 200 V. The proposed architecture is intended as a design guide for realizing a universal switch, rather than a fabricated implementation. To demonstrate system-level interactions, behavioral MATLAB/Simulink (R2024b) simulations are presented using generic components, which show expected functional responses but are not tied to process-specific device models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".