MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414533661 · doi:10.1007/s40620-025-02431-1

Exploring vascular access survival in prevalent thrice-weekly in-centre nocturnal haemodialysis patients

2025· article· en· W4414533661 on OpenAlexaff
Katherine L. Hull, Ann Bugeja, Matthew Graham‐Brown, Lindsay Ann Reid, Aiden Smith, Brigit C. van Jaarsveld, James O. Burton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nephrology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
KeywordsVascular accessNocturnalVascular diseaseHemodialysisNephrologyProportional hazards model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: This study explores vascular access complications in patients established on in-centre nocturnal haemodialysis (INHD) compared to conventional haemodialysis. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study; patients acted as their own control. Data were collected from three centres. Adults established on INHD (intervention) preceded by usual daytime haemodialysis (control) were eligible. Data were collected between 01/01/2009 and 12/31/2021. The data collection period was up to 12 months for both control and intervention periods. The primary outcome was a composite of outcomes related to vascular access complications: hospitalisation, intervention, change in vascular access modality, change in dialysis modality and death. The primary outcome was evaluated by time-to-event rate in days using Kaplan-Meier plots. Statistical significance was accepted at a P < 0.05. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five individuals were included: median age was 52.0 years (IQR 36.0-65.0), 71.0% (n = 103) were male, and 57.2% (n = 83) were White. The primary outcome occurred in 24.1% (n = 35) during the intervention and in 25.5% (n = 37) during the control period (P = 0.875). The 12-month vascular access survival probability was 73.4% (95%CI 65.8-81.0%) for the intervention and 70.6% (95%CI 62.4%-78.8%) for the control period. During the intervention period, arteriovenous grafts were associated with lower vascular access survival (P < 0.001). Regular vitamin K antagonist was associated with a lower 12-month vascular access survival for both the intervention (P = 0.044) and the control periods (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There does not appear to be an increased risk to vascular access events for INHD compared to daytime haemodialysis. Vascular access type and regular anticoagulation were associated with a reduced vascular access survival probability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NephrologySame topicCentral Venous Catheters and HemodialysisFrench-language works237,207