Bibliographic record
Abstract
Antecedentes: Debido a su origen, por el movimiento neopositivista, la epistemología moderna siempre ha tenido y todavía tiene un fuerte prejuicio antimetafísico. Sin embargo, uno de los filósofos más ilustres de nuestro tiempo, Evandro Agazzi, en su obra siempre ha sostenido no solo que las dos son compatibles, sino que basándose en la epistemología se puede incluso derivar una ontología con alcance metafísico. Objetivo: Estudiar la obra de Agazzi desde este punto de vista, para ver si su tesis está bien comprobada. Método: Se han considerado 28 de las principales obras de Agazzi, evaluándolas por medio de una discusión crítica. Resultados: Se ha llegado a establecer que la tesis de Agazzi resulta bien comprobada. Conclusión: Las dos perspectivas, epistemológica y ontológica-metafísica, más bien que contradecirse, se complementan y se sustentan una con otra, así llevándonos a una mejor comprensión de ambas, como Agazzi siempre ha afirmado.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".