Partenariats de niche d'innovation - Un guide du processus de coaching
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Partenariats de niche d'innovation -Un guide du processus de coaching.Agrinatura, Paris et FAO, Rome.32 pp.Le projet CDAIS (Renforcement des capacits pour les Systmes d'innovation agricole) est financi par l'Union Europpenne.Ce document a t produit avec le support financier de l'Union Europpenne.Les opinions exprimes dans ce document ne refltent pas celles de l'Union Europpenne.Les appellations employes dans ce produit d'information et la prsentation des donnes qui y figurent n'impliquent de la part de l'Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture (FAO) ou Agrinatura aucune prise de position quant au statut juridique ou au stade de dveloppement des pays, territoires, villes ou zones ou de leurs autorits, ni quant au trac de leurs frontires ou limites.Le fait qu'une socit ou qu'un produit manufactur, brevet ou non, soit mentionn ne signifie pas que la FAO ou l'Agrinatura approuvent ou recommandent ladite socit ou ledit produit de prfrence d'autres socits ou produits analogues qui ne sont pas cits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".