MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414538403 · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2025.3614632

Cost-Aware VNF Decomposition for VNF Forwarding Graph Embedding

2025· article· en· W4414538403 on OpenAlexaff
Azadeh Azhdari, Amin Ebrahimzadeh, Carla Mouradian, Róbert Szabó, Roch Glitho

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsEricsson (Canada)Concordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNetwork virtualizationVirtual networkNetwork topologyDecompositionEmbeddingHeuristicsInteger programmingGraph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To implement a Network Service (NS) within a Network Function Virtualization (NFV) environment, it is essential to create a sequence of connected Virtual Network Functions (VNFs), known as a VNF Forwarding Graph (VNF-FG), and then embed it onto the substrate network. The emergence of VNF decomposition as a new functional architecture allows VNFs to be broken down into smaller sub-functions, offering enhanced flexibility, resource sharing, and scalability. VNF decomposition can significantly reduce VNF embedding costs since different sub-functions can be efficiently reused by multiple network requests. However, when VNFs are decomposed into multiple sub-functions, selecting the appropriate decomposition option for each VNF and constructing the VNF-FG to embed onto the substrate network poses a significant challenge in NFV resource allocation (NFV-RA). A key challenge is identifying the optimal decomposition option among all possible choices for VNF embedding. In this paper, we introduce a cost-aware algorithm designed to address the topological decomposition of VNF-FGs, focusing on minimizing embedding costs while meeting specified service requirements. We formulate the VNF topology decomposition problem using Integer Linear Programming (ILP) to select the best decomposition option and minimize the embedding cost. Furthermore, we propose four efficient heuristics for different topologies to identify the optimal decomposition options for network embedding. Simulation results demonstrate that our proposed algorithm outperforms existing benchmarks in terms of embedding costs and achieves execution times that are up to 95% better than the SE approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service ManagementSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207