Joint Quantization and Pruning Neural Networks Approach: A Case Study on FSO Receivers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Towards fast, hardware-efficient, and lowcomplexity receivers, we propose a compression-aware learning approach and examine it on free-space optical (FSO) receivers for turbulence mitigation. The learning approach jointly quantize, prune, and train a convolutional neural network (CNN). In addition, we propose to have the CNN weights of power of two values so we replace the multiplication operations bit-shifting operations in every layer that has significant lower computational cost. The compression idea in the proposed approach is that the loss function is updated and both the quantization levels and the pruning limits are optimized in every epoch of training. The compressed CNN is examined for two levels of compression (1-bit and 2-bits) over different FSO systems. The numerical results show that the compression approach provides negligible decrease in performance in case of 1-bit quantization and the same performance in case of 2-bits quantization, compared to the full-precision CNNs. In general, the proposed IM/DD FSO receivers show better bit-error rate (BER) performance (without the need for channel state information (CSI)) compared to the maximum likelihood (ML) receivers that utilize imperfect CSI when the DL model is compressed whether with 1-bit or 2-bit quantization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".