MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adaptive Edge Caching in Dynamic Environments Using PPO and Transfer Learning

2025· article· en· W4414538848 on OpenAlexaff
Farnaz Niknia, Ping Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFile transferBackhaul (telecommunications)Edge deviceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionPopularityRendering (computer graphics)Transfer of learningConvergence (economics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study tackles the problem of edge caching within dynamic settings, where increasing traffic demands put pressure on backhaul links and core network infrastructures. We introduce a caching method based on Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) that integrates essential file characteristics, including size, lifetime, importance, and popularity, while also accommodating random file request patterns to better mirror real-world edge caching situations. Dynamic environments often experience fluctuations in content popularity and request rates, rendering previously established policies less effective since they were tailored to earlier conditions. Although training a new policy from scratch in a changed environment is feasible, it is often inefficient and resource-intensive. To solve this issue, we present a PPO algorithm enhanced with transfer learning, which improves convergence in new environments by utilizing previously acquired knowledge. Our simulation results highlight the substantial advantages of our approach, outperforming recent transfer learning-based methods in terms of convergence rate, demonstrating its potential to enhance edge caching in dynamic real-world scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207