PureDiffusion: Using Backdoor to Counter Backdoor in Generative Diffusion Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diffusion models (DMs) are state-of-the-art generative models that learn to model complex data distributions based on iterative noise addition and denoising. Thanks to their superior capacity in generative tasks, DMs have been investigated for various applications in the communication field such as network optimization, channel estimation, semantic communication, and cybersecurity. However, recent studies have shown their vulnerability regarding backdoor attacks, in which backdoored DMs consistently generate a designated harmful result called backdoor target when the models' input contains a backdoor trigger. Although various backdoor techniques have been investigated to attack DMs, defense methods against these threats are still limited and underexplored. In this paper, we introduce PureDiffusion, a novel backdoor defense framework that can efficiently detect backdoor attacks by inverting backdoor triggers embedded in DMs. Our extensive experiments on various trigger-target pairs show that PureDiffusion outperforms existing defense methods with a large gap in terms of fidelity (i.e., how much the inverted trigger resembles the original trigger) and backdoor success rate (i.e., the rate that the inverted trigger leads to the corresponding backdoor target). Notably, in certain cases, backdoor triggers inverted by PureDiffusion even achieve higher attack success rate than the original triggers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".