MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Two-Stage CAE-Based Federated Learning Framework for Efficient Jamming Detection in 5G Networks

2025· article· en· W4414539293 on OpenAlexafffund
Samhita Kuili, Mohammadreza Amini, Burak Kantarcı

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAutoencoderFederated learningJammingEncoderConvergence (economics)Deep learningUnsupervised learningData modeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cyber-security for 5G networks is drawing notable attention due to an increase in complex jamming attacks that could target the critical 5G Radio Frequency (RF) domain. These attacks pose a significant risk to heterogeneous network (HetNet) architectures, leading to degradation in network performance. Conventional machine-learning techniques for jamming detection rely on centralized training while increasing the odds of data privacy. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a decentralized two-stage federated learning (FL) framework for jamming detection in 5G femtocells. Our proposed distributed framework encompasses using the Federated Averaging (FedAVG) algorithm to train a Convolutional Autoencoder (CAE) for unsupervised learning. In the second stage, we use a fully connected network (FCN) built on the pre-trained CAE encoder that is trained using Federated Proximal (FedProx) algorithm to perform supervised classification. Our experimental results depict that our proposed framework (FedAVG and FedProx) accomplishes efficient training and prediction across non-IID client datasets without compromising data privacy. Specifically, our framework achieves a precision of 0.94, recall of 0.90, F1-score of 0.92, and an accuracy of 0.92, while minimizing communication rounds to 30 and achieving robust convergence in detecting jammed signals with an optimal client count of 6.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207