Leveraging MoE-Based Large Language Model for Zero-Shot Multi-Task Semantic Communication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multi-task semantic communication (SC) can reduce the computational resources in wireless systems since retraining is not required when switching between tasks. However, existing approaches typically rely on task-specific embeddings to identify the intended task, necessitating retraining the entire model when given a new task. Consequently, this drives the need for a multitask SC system that can handle new tasks without additional training, known as zero-shot learning. Inspired by the superior zero-shot capabilities of large language models (LLMs), we leverage pre-trained instruction-tuned LLMs, referred to as fine-tuned language net (FLAN), to improve the generalization capability. We incorporate a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture in the FLAN model and propose MoE-FLAN-SC architecture for multi-task SC systems. Our proposed MoE-FLAN-SC architecture can further improve the performance of FLAN-T5 model without increasing the computational cost. Moreover, we design a multi-task feature extraction module (FEM) which can adaptively extract relevant features across various tasks given the provided features and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Simulation results show that our proposed MoE-FLAN-SC architecture outperforms three state-of-the-art models in terms of the average accuracy on four different unseen tasks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".