MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414540220 · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.5c02581

Physics-Informed Neural Network with NSGA II and Levenberg–Marquardt Method for Kinetic Modeling in Heavy Oil Hydrocracking

2025· article· en· W4414540220 on OpenAlexafffund
Shahla Alizadeh, Souvik Ta, Ajay K. Ray, S. Lakshminarayanan

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWestern University
KeywordsOverfittingSortingSolverArtificial neural networkGenetic algorithmConvergence (economics)Matching (statistics)Kinetic energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurately modeling reaction kinetics in heavy oil hydrocracking is essential for optimizing reactor performance and improving product distribution predictions. This study proposes a novel hybrid framework that integrates a physics-informed neural network (PINN) with nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) and Levenberg–Marquardt (LM) optimization method to achieve fast and accurate estimation of kinetic parameters. Unlike conventional approaches, the proposed method combines global and local search: NSGA-II generates high-quality initial parameter estimates, while LM efficiently refines them, ensuring convergence within 300 epochs. This hybrid framework leverages a neural network to model time-evolving behavior, while a Runge–Kutta–based solver enforces reaction kinetics, enabling robust kinetic parameter estimation under physical constraints. Four kinetic models previously proposed in hydrocracking research were implemented as physics constraints and systematically evaluated using the PINN framework. Among them, the most detailed, referred to here as model 4, emerged as the most comprehensive and accurate, capturing all major saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes (SARA) conversions and byproduct formation (gas and coke). Building upon this, a refined 10-parameter kinetic model was proposed by excluding three low-sensitivity reaction parameters. The simplified model preserved all dominant pathways and demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy across four temperatures (360–400 °C), total error (data + physics MSE on mass fractions) was on the order of 10 –3 to 10 –2 across training, validation, and testing, with R 2 between 0.93 and 0.99. To prevent overfitting and improve generalization, early stopping and a 20% dropout strategy were employed. This study presents a novel application of a hybrid PINN framework that integrates a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm with numerical optimization for kinetic modeling in heavy oil hydrocracking. By embedding physical constraints into the learning process, the framework offers a scalable, interpretable, and accurate approach for estimating reaction parameters and capturing the dynamic behavior of the hydrocracking process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research→Same topicPetroleum Processing and Analysis→French-language works237,207→