MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Caregivers’ Utilisation Of Long-Lasting Insecticide-Treated Nets For Under-Five Children At Two Selected Clinics In Petauke District, Eastern Province, Zambia

2025· article· en· W4414541432 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal For Multidisciplinary Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMosquito-borne diseases and control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalariaLogistic regressionSystematic samplingPsychological interventionMarital statusQuarter (Canadian coin)Health facilityUnder-five

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Malaria can be prevented if LLITNs are used appropriately for under-five children. Unfortunately, studies show that there is an increased prevalence of malaria in underfive children despite the free mass distribution of LLITNs to their caregivers. Malaria if left untreated leads to increased morbidity and mortality rate among under-five children. There has been mass distribution of LLITNs in Zambia so that every under-five child should be sleeping under an LLITN. About 228,725 LLITNs were distributed throughout Petauke district in 2014. However, the magnitude of malaria cases among under-five children at the study sites continued to increase by 17.7% between 2016 and 2019 (PDMHIS, 2019). The study aimed at investigating factors that influence utilisation of LLITNs among caregivers of under-five children at two selected clinics. Methods and Materials: An analytical cross-sectional study design was used and 328 study respondents from two clinics were sampled. Systematic random sampling was used to select the study respondents. Data collection was done using a semi-structured questionnaire. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23was used to process and analyse data. Chi-square test and multivariable logistic regression were used to determine the relationship among variables. Results: The study results showed that more than three quarters (75.9% n = 249) of the respondents used LLITNs for their under-five children while less than a quarter (24.1% n = 79) did not. The study also revealed that knowledge on LLITN, attitude towards LLITN use and marital status were significantly (P<0.001) associated with LLITNs use. Probable interventions included increasing health education messages as an important activity, which should be rendered to all caregivers of under-five children. Conclusion and recommendation: The study results revealed that there is a significant association between knowledge, attitude towards LLITNs, and utilisation of LLITNs among caregivers of under-five children. In addition, marital status was also significantly associated with utilisation of LLITNs. The use of LLITN is not the only strategy of eliminating malaria according to the goal of MoH but must be used in combination with other strategies such as IEC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.389 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it