MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414542671 · doi:10.3390/en18195128

Computational Analysis of the Effects of Power on the Electromagnetic Characteristics of Microwave Systems with Plasma

2025· article· en· W4414542671 on OpenAlexaff
K. Hadidi, Camille E. Williams, Vadim V. Yakovlev

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Sudbury
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrowavePlasmaUpgradePower (physics)Electric fieldScalingElectromagnetic fieldReflection coefficientReflection (computer programming)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The scaling of microwave plasma technologies from successful laboratory demonstrations to larger industrial applications usually involves an increase in microwave power. This upgrade is accompanied by a higher electron density (and electric conductivity) of the plasma that often limits the power efficiency of the device. In this paper, we address this issue through a focused computational study of electromagnetic characteristics of a microwave system containing plasma. Our approach employs finite-different time-domain analysis supported by a simple model which characterizes the plasma medium using plasma frequency and the frequency of electron-neutral collisions. Based on experimental data for electron density with respect to power, the plasma frequency is generated as a linear function of power, thus enabling a direct understanding of how frequency characteristics of the reflection coefficient and patterns of the electric field may vary for different power levels in a variety of plasma scenarios. For a cavity modeled after conventional plasma applicators, computational results illustrate complex behavior of the field with respect to power. When the power is increased, energy efficiency may decrease, remain low, or increase depending on where the operating frequency stands with respect to the system’s resonances. The proposed modeling approach identifies the system parameters which are most impactful in tuning the system to resonance, thus informing the design variables for subsequent computer-aided design of the scaled system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergiesSame topicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics ResearchFrench-language works237,207