MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414542690 · doi:10.26443/mjgh.v14i1.1681

How the Digital Healthcare Shift Affects Older Adults: A Commentary

2025· article· en· W4414542690 on OpenAlexaff
Maira Corinne Claudio, Maryam El Alaoui, Lara Abou-Chakra

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Journal of Global Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRetirement, Disability, and Employment
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital healthHealth careWearable computerWearable technologyDigital transformationeHealthOlder peopleHealthcare system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, healthcare in North America has transitioned towards the use of digital technologies and data analytics. Some components of this digital transformation include increased use of telemedicine, electronic health records, data analytics, wearable technologies, and artificial intelligence. Despite these new developments continuing to reshape the healthcare landscape and allowing for better accessibility, efficiency, and patient participation, they also present challenges for older adults, which limit their ability to benefit from digital health innovation fully.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.952

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill Journal of Global HealthSame topicRetirement, Disability, and EmploymentFrench-language works237,207