MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414545117 · doi:10.3390/en18195123

Identification Method for Wideband Oscillation Parameters Caused by Grid-Forming Renewable Energy Sources Based on Multiple Matching Synchrosqueezing Transformation

2025· article· en· W4414545117 on OpenAlexaff
Ping Xiong, Yu Sun, Lie Li, Yifan Zhao, Xiaoqian Zhu, Shunfan He, Ming Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Hubei Province
KeywordsHilbert–Huang transformLow-frequency oscillationOscillation (cell signaling)Robustness (evolution)WidebandHilbert transformControl theory (sociology)Instantaneous phaseTransformation (genetics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The oscillation problem has emerged as one of the critical challenges confronting emerging power systems, particularly with the increasing penetration of grid-forming renewable energy sources. This trend can lead to the coexistence of multiple oscillation modes across a wide frequency range. To enhance the safety and stability of power systems, this paper proposes a wideband oscillation parameter identification method based on the multiple matching synchrosqueezing transform (MMSST), addressing the limitations of traditional time–frequency analysis techniques in accurately separating and extracting oscillation components during wideband parameter identification. The method first applies MMSST to decompose the measured oscillation signal into a set of intrinsic mode functions (IMFs). Subsequently, the Hilbert transform is applied to each IMF to extract the instantaneous frequency, amplitude, and initial phase, thereby achieving precise parameter identification of the oscillation signal. The validation study results demonstrate that the MMSST algorithm outperforms the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and variational mode decomposition (VMD) algorithms in accurately extracting individual oscillation components and estimating their dynamic characteristics. Additionally, the proposed method achieves superior performance in terms of both accuracy and robustness when compared to the EMD and VMD algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergiesSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207