MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414554071 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-18261-x

Input driven optimization of echo state network parameters for prediction on chaotic time series

2025· article· en· W4414554071 on OpenAlexaff
Leila Gonbadi, Habib Rostami, Ebrahim Sahafizadeh, Mojtaba Mansouri Nejad, Ahmad Shirzadi

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReservoir computingHyperparameterEcho state networkSeries (stratigraphy)ChaoticTime seriesNetwork topologyEcho (communications protocol)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Echo State Networks (ESNs) have emerged as powerful tools for time series prediction, yet their performance heavily depends on reservoir structure, which traditionally relies on random weights independent of input data characteristics. This paper presents a theoretical framework and optimization approach for ESN reservoir design, demonstrating that reservoir weights should be adapted based on input data properties, and that both topology and weights significantly influence prediction accuracy. Building on theoretical insights about input-dependent reservoir behavior, we propose two complementary methods: a supervised approach that directly optimizes reservoir weights through gradient descent, and a semi-supervised technique that combines small-world and scale-free network properties with hyperparameter optimization. Our extensive experiments across multiple datasets, including synthetic chaotic systems (Mackey-Glass and NARMA time series) and real-world climate data, demonstrate that the proposed methods consistently outperform traditional ESNs by achieving substantially lower prediction errors. Most notably, our analysis reveals that edge connectivity parameters play a crucial role, second only to reservoir size in determining network performance. These findings provide important practical guidelines for ESN design and open new directions for automated reservoir optimization based on input data characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicNeural Networks and Reservoir ComputingFrench-language works237,207