MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414554672 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-18242-0

Adaptive fuzzy-recurrent neural network tuned fractional-order distributed control for robust frequency regulation in multi-microgrid systems

2025· article· en· W4414554672 on OpenAlexaff
Jeevitha Kandasamy, Rajeswari Ramachandran, Sghaier Guizani, Habib Hamam

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptabilityRobustness (evolution)ScalabilityAutomatic frequency controlSettling timeControl theory (sociology)PID controllerOvershoot (microwave communication)Frequency regulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an advanced frequency control solution for multi-microgrid systems (MMGS) with high renewable energy penetration, where conventional control methods struggle with scalability and disturbance resilience. We propose a Distributed Consensus Control Strategy (DCS) using a Fractional Order PID (FOPID) controller adaptively tuned by a Fuzzy-Recurrent Neural Network (FRNN). Our method delivers significant improvements in both transient and steady-state performance compared to established approaches. Extensive real-time hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) testing on a three-microgrid platform demonstrates the superiority of the proposed controller. In MG1, it reduces settling time by 29% (4.19 s vs. 5.93 s for PID), lowers peak overshoot by over 90% (0.0007 vs. 0.0076 for PID), and cuts absolute error by more than 80% (1.017 vs. 6.32 for PID). Similar improvements are validated across MG2 and MG3, and comprehensive scenario testing confirms the method's robustness under diverse disturbances. The proposed FRNN-tuned FOPID-based DCS stands out as the first adaptive, distributed framework offering real-time self-optimization and exceptional resilience for frequency regulation in MMGS. Its demonstrated performance and adaptability make it a leading candidate for future smart grids and cyber-physical energy systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.818

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207