MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414568228 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.09.019

Quality inspection and condition-based preventive maintenance in a closed-loop multi-stage manufacturing system

2025· article· en· W4414568228 on OpenAlexaff
G. J., Kenné J.P.

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreventive maintenanceScrapRemanufacturingQuality (philosophy)Production lineProduction (economics)Factory (object-oriented programming)Total productive maintenanceAssembly linePredictive maintenance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research presents the development of a Serial-Closed-Loop-Multi-Stage Manufacturing System from a circular economy perspective. The system integrates a production line where five specialized machines operate across both forward and reverse remanufacturing processes. However, due to varying deterioration levels, these machines cannot consistently produce defect-free items, resulting in increased scrap and customer penalty costs. To address this challenge, we propose a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model that optimally allocates quality inspection stations and schedules for preventive maintenance across multiple working shifts. The objective is to minimize total production costs, including quality control, maintenance and customer penalties. The model’s effectiveness is validated through numerical experiments under three distinct machine deterioration scenarios, demonstrating its potential to enhance efficiency and sustainability in modern manufacturing systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.820

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicManufacturing Process and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207