MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414568591 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.09.121

Event-triggered Resilient Control Design for a Group of Connected AUVs in the Presence of DoS Attack

2025· article· en· W4414568591 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsController (irrigation)Control theory (sociology)Denial-of-service attackStability (learning theory)Control (management)Control system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a resilient controller is designed for connected autonomous vehicles against Denial of Service (DoS) attacks. The controller utilizes a sliding mode control structure, in conjunction with an event-triggered mechanism to reduce the network burden. The stability analysis is conducted using Lyapunov theory. The proposed controller aims to maintain the stability and performance of the connected autonomous vehicle system in the presence of DoS attacks, by continuously adjusting the control inputs and by reducing the network burden by using the event-triggered mechanism. The proposed approach is applied to the steering control subsystem of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, and the obtained results show that the proposed controller can effectively mitigate the impact of DoS attacks, reduce the network burden, and maintain the stability of the connected autonomous vehicles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it