MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414568597 · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146684

An integrative framework for eco-efficiency assessment in plant-protein extraction processes: Hotspot analysis, protein loss tracking, and uncertainty analysis

2025· article· en· W4414568597 on OpenAlexafffund
Derrick Kpakpo Allotey, Ebenezer Miezah Kwofie, Praiya Asavajaru, Anusha Samaranayaka

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cleaner Production · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSustainable Supply Chain Management
Canadian institutionsPlant Biotechnology InstituteMcGill University
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsSustainabilityHotspot (geology)CommercializationScalabilityUncertainty quantificationSustainable development

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past few years, the growing demand for plant-based proteins has intensified the need to scale up extraction technologies, for efficient and sustainable protein production. Towards the adoption of existing methods, modified extraction methods as well as emerging technologies, there is the need to assess and ascertain the overall sustainability performance of the methods, integrating economic, product quality and environmental perspectives. However, a comprehensive assessment framework that integrates these three (3) sustinability dimensions, for the plant-protein industry, remains lacking. This study proposes a novel eco-efficiency assessment framework tailored to evaluate sustainability of plant-protein extraction methods, with a focus on industrial commercialization potential. The framework integrates eco-efficiency analysis, hotspot identification of economic value, protein loss tracking, protein purity, environmental impacts, and uncertainty and global sensitivity analyses to highlight key production variables that influences sustainability outcomes. The framework was applied to a case study of pea protein extraction by the alkaline-isoelectric precipitation (ALK-IEP) method with multiple trials using different yellow pea varieties. Results highlighted the major contribution of the spray drying, pasteurization and extraction-decantation sections to eco-environmental outcomes and protein content loss. The findings offer insights for optimizing the extraction process and improving eco-efficiency, contributing to more sustainable, scalable commercial pea protein production. • A novel holistic eco-efficiency assessment framework is proposed for evaluating plant-protein extraction methods. • The framework incorporates hotspot and global sensitivity analyses to reveal key variables that impact techno-eco-environmental performance. • The framework is applied to a case study on pea protein extraction by the wet fractionation method. • The findings provide valuable insights for improving eco-efficiency, and supporting the sustainable commercialization of pea protein production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.423
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cleaner ProductionSame topicSustainable Supply Chain ManagementFrench-language works237,207