MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414571127 · doi:10.1080/15332691.2025.2564393

Specifying the Effects of an Online, Self-Help Couples’ Intervention on PTSD Clusters and the Influence of Improvements in Relationship Satisfaction

2025· article· en· W4414571127 on OpenAlexaff
Ashley Siegel, Alexander O. Crenshaw, Candice M. Monson, Skye Fitzpatrick

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Couple & Relationship Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAttachment and Relationship Dynamics
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntervention (counseling)Life satisfactionStructural equation modelingCluster (spacecraft)Psychological intervention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Couple HOPES (Helping Overcome PTSD and Enhance Satisfaction; CH) is an online intervention for individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and their partners. The current study sought to examine which PTSD clusters improve throughout CH and whether changes in relationship satisfaction were associated with changes in PTSD clusters. Multilevel modeling revealed that CH led to improvements in all PTSD clusters (intrusions, avoidance, cognitions and mood, and arousal). Greater improvements in relationship satisfaction were associated with improvements in intrusion symptoms, suggesting an important link between relationship satisfaction and intrusion symptoms in PTSD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Couple & Relationship TherapySame topicAttachment and Relationship DynamicsFrench-language works237,207