MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414571629 · doi:10.1016/j.jdin.2025.06.009

Supporting evidence and recommendations for the management of patients with systemic-eligible atopic dermatitis: A Canadian consensus document

2025· article· en· W4414571629 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kerri Purdy, Melinda Gooderham, Mohannad Abu‐Hilal, April W. Armstrong, Rachel Asiniwasis, Gurbir Dhadwal, Carolyn Jack, Perla Lansang, Fiona Lovegrove, Julien Ringuet, Shanna Spring

Bibliographic record

VenueJAAD International · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioMcGill UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of SaskatchewanMcMaster UniversityQueen's UniversityCentre de Recherche Dermatologique du Québec MétropolitainProbity Medical ResearchUniversity of TorontoDalhousie University
FundersSanofi
KeywordsHealth careMEDLINEPrimary careHealth professionalsAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.077
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.197
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.869

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0770.197
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.007
Bibliometrics0.0190.013
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0120.006
Research integrity0.0110.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAAD International→Same topicDermatology and Skin Diseases→French-language works237,207→