MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414571816 · doi:10.1016/j.snr.2025.100387

Centrifugal microfluidic systems for cancer cell separation: Advances, challenges, and applications

2025· article· en· W4414571816 on OpenAlexafffund
A. Farahinia, Wenjun Zhang, Ildikó Badea

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors and Actuators Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMicrofluidicsCancerCancer cellCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cancer remains a leading global health challenge, with circulating tumor cells (CTCs) playing a pivotal role in metastasis and disease progression. Efficient detection and isolation of CTCs are essential for early diagnosis, therapeutic monitoring, and the advancement of personalized treatment strategies. However, their extreme rarity in peripheral blood presents significant technical challenges for reliable enrichment and analysis. Centrifugal microfluidic systems, or lab-on-a-disc (LOCD) platforms, offer a promising solution by enabling automated, high-throughput, and cost-effective separation of rare cancer cells with minimal manual intervention. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of recent advances in centrifugal microfluidic technologies, with a focus on cancer cell separation for diagnostics and the challenges of clinical translation. Particular attention is given to the optimization of separation techniques, improvements in microchannel design, and strategies to minimize contamination and cell damage while enhancing purity and yield. We critically compare label-free, affinity-based, and hybrid separation approaches, and examine how material selection, surface functionalization, automation, and integrated detection modules in-fluence device performance. Clinical relevance is emphasized throughout, including examples of real patient applications, regulatory challenges, and translational barriers. Furthermore, we propose future directions to address persistent limitations such as clogging, limited specificity, and standardization. While routine clinical implementation remains complex, recent innovations have significantly improved system robustness, reproducibility, and accessibility. This review serves as a resource for researchers and clinicians, summarizing the current state of the field and outlining the path forward for the next generation of centrifugal microfluidic systems tailored for cancer cell separation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensors and Actuators ReportsSame topicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207