MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414575168 · doi:10.1101/2025.09.25.25336571

Intensive care unit and hospital mortality for non-COVID critically ill patients before, and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Alberta hospitals: retrospective, observational cohort study

2025· preprint· en· W4414575168 on OpenAlexaffabout
Vincent Lau, Fadi Hammal, Wendy Sligl, Constantine Karvellas, Demetrios J. Kutsogiannis, Fernando G. Zampieri, M. Elizabeth Wilcox, Kirsten M. Fiest, Dan Niven, Henry T. Stelfox, Danny J. Zuege, Ken Kuljit S. Parhar, Sean M. Bagshaw, Oleksa Rewa

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicIntensive care unitObservational studyIntensive careCritically illCohort studyLogistic regressionOdds ratio

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objectives The Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had indirect impacts on healthcare provided to critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) non-COVID patients and their outcomes. Therefore, we examined the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with non-COVID critical illness during the pandemic and pre-pandemic epochs. Design Retrospective, population-based, observational cohort study. Setting All adult patients admitted to general ICUs in Alberta, Canada, from March 2017-2020 (pre-pandemic period) and March 2020-2023 (pandemic period). Data sources Data was captured from an integrated critical care clinical information system (eCritical Alberta) and Alberta Health Services (AHS) administrative databases were utilized. Measurements and main results A total of 80,540 non-COVID patients were admitted to ICUs in Alberta in the period between March 2017 and March 2023, equally distributed between the pandemic (40,196, 50.1%) and pre-pandemic (40,344, 49.9%) periods. For pandemic versus pre-pandemic cohorts, patient mean age was 57.7 ± 16.2 vs 58.5 ± 16.6 years and mean APACHE II score was 19.5 ± 8.8 vs 18.8 ± 8.5, respectively. ICU mortality was higher during the pandemic compared with pre-pandemic (14.2% vs. 11.2%, mean difference [MD]: +3.1%, adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.05-1.20, p<0.001) after logistic regression adjustment. The hospital mortality was significantly higher in the pandemic vs. the pre-pandemic period (23.6% vs. 15.9%; MD: +7.7%, adjusted OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.81-2.02, p<0.001). There was greater ICU (5.95 ± 9.4 vs. 5.35 ± 8.5 days, MD: +0.63 days, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.72 days, p<0.001), and lower hospital (18.0 ± 28.0 vs. 19.9 ± 33.3 days, MD: -1.89 days, 95% CI: -1.45 to -2.32 days p<0.001) lengths of stay (LOS) during the pandemic compared with pre-pandemic. Conclusion During the pandemic period, non-COVID patients had worse outcomes, greater adjusted ICU and hospital mortality, and higher resource utilization with increased ICU lengths of stay, when compared with pre-pandemic periods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.474
Threshold uncertainty score0.954

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts→French-language works237,207→