MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414575179 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v17n11p1

Education, Savings, and Economic Growth in Côte d'Ivoire: An Intertemporal Application of the Ramsey Model

2025· article· en· W4414575179 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ouattara Kifory

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic theories and models
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLife expectancyHuman capitalInvestment (military)Error correction modelPublic spendingGrowth modelExpectancy theoryShort runCapital (architecture)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the impact of education expenditures, demographic growth, and life expectancy on economic growth in Côte d’Ivoire through the intertemporal Ramsey model. The study employs an ARDL approach combined with an Error Correction Model (ECM) to assess the effects of public spending on education, demographic dynamics, and life expectancy on GDP per capita. In the long run, the findings reveal that these three variables exert a positive and significant influence on economic growth, highlighting the central role of human capital and demographic factors in the development process. In the short run, only investment in education shows an immediate measurable effect. The error correction term is negative and significant, indicating a rapid adjustment toward equilibrium after a shock. These results underscore the necessity of strengthening social policies, particularly in education and health, to foster inclusive and sustainable growth in the medium and long term.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Economics and FinanceSame topicEconomic theories and modelsFrench-language works237,207