Depression reduces structurally informed network flexibility in premanifest Huntington’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1 Abstract Background and objectives The extent to which structural connectivity constrains effective connectivity in both depression and neurodegenerative contexts remains poorly understood. In particular, the relationship between structural connectivity aberrations and effective dysconnectivity associated with depression in Huntingtin’s disease remains uncharacterized. Here, we applied a novel procedure that implements structural connectivity-informed spectral dynamic causal modelling to examine how structural connectivity shapes directed inter-regional influences in premanifest Huntington’s disease gene expansion carriers (HDGECs) with and without depression history. Methods Using spectral dynamic causal modeling embedded in a hierarchical empirical Bayes framework, we analyzed fMRI data from 98 premanifest HDGECs across default mode network and striatum (caudate and putamen). HDGECs were split into two groups based on either having a history of depression or not. Depression severity on both the Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd Edition (BDI-II) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Depression Subscale (HADS-D) was used to measure clinically elevated depression symptoms. Leave-one-out cross-validation was implemented to test predictive validity. Results Model evidence substantially favored structurally informed over uninformed approaches across all participants. For HDGECs, having a history of depression was associated with reduced baseline variability in effective connectivity (decreased α parameter), with particularly tight regularization of near-zero-valued structural connections toward zero effective connectivity values while leaving strongly connected pathways relatively unaffected. Effects converged on striatal self-connectivity and hippocampal-striatal pathways, with distinct patterns emerging between depression history groups. Notably, clinically elevated depression revealed differential connectivity signatures, with right caudate self-connectivity showing positive correlations with clinical cut-offs for HDGECs with and without depression history. In leave-one-out cross-validation, specific connections including DMN-to-striatum (BDI: r = -0.31, p = .002; HADS-D: r = -0.33, p = .001), right hippocampus-to-left caudate (BDI: r = -0.46, p < .001; HADS-D: r = -0.30, p = .002), and left caudate-to-left putamen (BDI: r = -0.48, p < .001; HADS-D: r = -0.30, p = .003) significantly predicted individual differences in depression severity scores. Discussion Together, these findings link reduced network flexibility to depression vulnerability in premanifest neurodegeneration, providing a mechanistic bridge between anatomical constraints, effective connectivity alterations, and clinical depression phenotypes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".